Skip to content

Check videos against workbook after creation #122

Closed

Description

@lenucksi

What we have left:

  • Upload new video.
  • Update references to new video (e.g. config.yaml, playlists).
  • Rewrite question.

Rationale

The workbook contains questions based on the videos - one could consider this the take-aways.
Especially in the case of the Contributor we are creating workbook content before the videos based on the Outline and the articles.
We need to ensure that the videos and articles contain content that matches the workbook questions and makes them properly answerable.

Action items & acceptance criteria

Prior to making the videos

  • Check that the Contributor video scripts have matching content for the workbook

After making the videos

  • Check the Contributor videos for content from the workbook

Acceptance:

  • Let someone uninvolved test themselves with the workbook based on the videos.
  • Introduction
    • Seen Through
    • Clean + Pass
    • Adapted + Pass now
  • Trusted Committer
    • Seen Through
    • Clean + Pass
    • Adapted + Pass now
  • Contributor (Videos can be seen here: https://innersourcecommons.org/learn/learning-path/contributor/)
    • Seen Through
    • Clean + Pass
    • Adapted + Pass now
  • Product Owner
    • Seen Through
    • Clean + Pass
    • Adapted + Pass now

Activity

  1. rrrutledge commented on Oct 8, 2019

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    We can also do this check after creating the video scripts yet still before shooting the video itself (#140)

  2. lenucksi commented on Nov 15, 2019

    @lenucksi
    MemberAuthor
  3. arnom-ms commented on Apr 2, 2020

    @arnom-ms
    Collaborator

    At this point the ask is to

    • Watch the video on one segment (available on our Google drive)
    • After watching one segment, review the workbook questions if the question(s) for the segment can be answered after watching the video.
  4. rrrutledge commented on Apr 16, 2020

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    @BrittanyIstenes working on this.

  5. BrittanyIstenes commented on Apr 23, 2020

    @BrittanyIstenes
    Collaborator

    Intro Review - Complete

    Introduction - Video 3

    • Planning role is not listed in guidance doc
    • Additional resource page leads to a 404

    Introduction - Video 4

    • Video script is more high level than the doc, but covers all the bases

    Introduction - Video 5

    • Mentorship is talked about in the video first, Openness is listed first in the doc
    • 10% of resource into your trusted committer is not listed in doc
    • Video only focused on Mentorship and Trusted committers, but did not get back into the other principles listed in the doc
  6. rrrutledge commented on Apr 23, 2020

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    Here is the workbook: https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourceLearningPath/tree/master/workbook

    Try out the assessment questions (no peeking).

  7. lenucksi commented on Apr 29, 2020

    @lenucksi
    MemberAuthor

    Introduction - Video 3

    • Additional resource page leads to a 404

    Do we control said URL such that we could un-404 it?

  8. rrrutledge commented on Apr 29, 2020

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    Which URL, specifically, are we talking about?

  9. BrittanyIstenes commented on Apr 30, 2020

    @BrittanyIstenes
    Collaborator
  10. 21 remaining items

  11. Ludmila-N commented on May 1, 2021

    @Ludmila-N
    Collaborator

    The intent here is "bug tickets" "well written issues". At least the good ones already help tremendously, so I definitely would want them. Where "well written" means: Detailed, with reproduction step, expectations and reality, possibly even a first patch or guess at a code location. Maybe we could add a small overlay on the video?

    Understood, and you say this in a few seconds - so this was provably a self-correction, but it sounds like you're listing bugs along with bug tickets. I think the best option is to cut or mute these ~5 seconds and leave the rest as is.

  12. Ludmila-N commented on May 1, 2021

    @Ludmila-N
    Collaborator

    Reviewing Contributor videos, Contributor Ethos section:
    Question 2 - no issues.
    Question 1, answer 4 has the explanation that was never mentioned in the video, suggest rewriting this option:

    Why 4 is incorrect: Getting your contribution accepted is an achievement to be celebrated. However, your involvement does not end there. You should plan to be available at a minimum to fulfil a 30-day warranty on your changes (and their impact), or even better: stay close to the community and help out with additional contributions.

    Also "fulfill" is spelled with double L at the end.

  13. lenucksi commented on May 6, 2021

    @lenucksi
    MemberAuthor

    Understood, and you say this in a few seconds - so this was provably a self-correction, but it sounds like you're listing bugs along with bug tickets. I think the best option is to cut or mute these ~5 seconds and leave the rest as is.

    Cutting it out sounds good. Do you happen to have taken a note of the time-code such that I can just edit it out and re-upload it?
    Other than that: We'll need to update parts of the website, the playlists on YT or other material with the new video code. Can you please point me to the places that need changing @tsadler1988 @voborgus ?

  14. lenucksi commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @lenucksi
    MemberAuthor

    "Providing good bugs" is at 3:25, "providing good issue tickets for bugs" is at 3:29
    Modified video has been uploaded to the the GDrive. We need someone to re-upload it to YT, adapt the YT playlists, add the thumbnail and modify the website parts accordingly.

  15. rrrutledge commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor
  16. clcoffey commented on Jun 29, 2021

    @clcoffey
    Collaborator

    The modified video is now on Youtube https://youtu.be/S0Gps2AbZ7M courtesy of @Katiegilroyy Can I just change the website directly to point it to the video or do you have to do it in your repository?

  17. lenucksi commented on Jul 5, 2021

    @lenucksi
    MemberAuthor

    New video is live and adapted. Remaining is adaptation of the Workbook question

  18. rrrutledge commented on Jul 9, 2021

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    Nice work!

  19. fioddor commented on Jul 19, 2021

    @fioddor
    Collaborator

    I've watched the Introduction videos and I was able to complete their corresponding workbook. I'm totally uninvolved in their creation, but on the other hand I already have some previous knowledge about open source communities, so take my feedback with a pinch of salt.

  20. rrrutledge commented on Jul 19, 2021

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    Thanks for this review @fioddor.

  21. rrrutledge commented on Jul 19, 2021

    @rrrutledge
    Contributor

    @lenucksi can you update the checkboxes in the description with what has been done and what is left?

  22. self-assigned this
    on Aug 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions