-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 893
Fix handling of waitqueue in ctor-eval #9172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stevenfontanella
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fuzz-fix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is surprising to me, since waitqueues don't seem like transparent holders of other data the way structs and arrays are. And it seems like this change is the cause of several of the other changes. What's the motivation here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mentioned this in the PR description, the idea is that
isDatais now true which hits a different code path in ctor-eval: link.Alternatively we could just add an extra check for waitqueue here in addition to
isData, but my thinking is that waitqueues really are GC data, and other passes that look atisDataare more likely to want to treat them that way (which this case is evidence of).From a quick look, it looks like this is the only pass that's affected in terms of real logic at the moment:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3AWebAssembly%2Fbinaryen+%2F%5CbisData%28%29%5Cb%2F&type=code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That code path is using
!value.isData() || value.isString()to mean "requires special global-creating logic." I think it would make more sense to update that code path to explicitly include waitqueues than it would to include waitqueues inisData.FWIW,
isDatais essentially a historical accident. At one point during the development of the GC proposal, there was adatatype that was a supertype of structs and arrays. The type was removed, but we keptisData()because it was shorter than writingisStruct() || isArray()everywhere. It's possible that it globally make the codebase clearer if we removed it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking is that waitqueue is 'similar' to struct and array that way; they are all stateful GC objects. Sounds good though, I don't have a strong opinion. waitqueue is definitely different in some ways.
FWIW it looks like we still use
gcDataas the identity of the global that we synthesize link. This looks like a problem with the current PR because we always usenullptrso there's no identity here link. Let me take a look and fix it.