Skip to content

Able to create a new job #80

Closed
Closed

Description

@martinraynov

Reason/Context

To be able to create a new job import from specifications available on other servers

Description

I am using a lot of specifications available on github enterprise servers.
With the microcks UI I can add them with the Importers -> Create a new Job feature but in the cli I can only import files that are located on the machine that executes the command.

Implementation ideas

Maybe the microcks-cli import function can be extended to accept also URLs

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Dec 6, 2024

    @github-actions

    👋 @martinraynov

    Welcome to the Microcks community! 💖

    Thanks and congrats 🎉 for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template or please update it accordingly.

    📢 If you're using Microcks in your organization, please add your company name to this list. 🙏 It really helps the project to gain momentum and credibility. It's a small contribution back to the project with a big impact.

    If you need to know why and how to add yourself to the list, please read the blog post "Join the Microcks Adopters list and Empower the vibrant open source Community 🙌"

    Hope you have a great time there!

    🌟 ~~~~~~~~~ 🌟

    📢 If you like Microcks, please ⭐ star ⭐ our repo to support it!

    🙏 It really helps the project to gain momentum and credibility. It's a small contribution back to the project with a big impact.

  2. lbroudoux commented on Dec 9, 2024

    @lbroudoux
    Member

    Thanks for the suggestion @martinraynov !

    Actually, the CLI needs to be refactored a bit and we started a 1.x branch a long time ago (see https://github.com/microcks/microcks-cli/tree/1.x). to start this effort. The idea would be to integrate some classic CLI tools libraries like Viper and others to have something extensible in the long term.

    Some contributors have already started the effort (like @JulienBreux - see https://github.com/JulienBreux/mksctl) but we need more cycles to get this running and integrate new commands.

    So it's a big YES for this feature but I think it would be better to pursue on refactoring first.

  3. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 21, 2025
  4. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jan 30, 2025
  5. cstv4 commented on Feb 13, 2025

    @cstv4

    Hey @lbroudoux @Harsh4902, is this issue resolved by #98 or something more needs to be done?. Thank you

  6. Harsh4902 commented on Feb 13, 2025

    @Harsh4902
    Member

    @cstv4 Yes, it's resolved now.

  7. Harsh4902 commented on Mar 14, 2025

    @Harsh4902
    Member

    @martinraynov As this issue has already been resolved by #98, can we close it?
    CC: @lbroudoux

  8. martinraynov commented on Mar 14, 2025

    @martinraynov
    Author

    feature added

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions