Repository navigation
Unless checking accesses, do not include unique symbols or numbers in index types - #23090
Closed
Wesley Wigham (weswigham) wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Wesley Wigham (weswigham) wants to merge 1 commit into
Wesley Wigham (weswigham) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Wesley Wigham (weswigham)
requested review from
Anders Hejlsberg (ahejlsberg) and
Ron Buckton (rbuckton)
April 2, 2018 21:30
Contributor
|
FWIW I actually think it makes a lot of sense for If it made it through a release with nobody complaining maybe it's a sign it was a good change? 🤷♂️ |
Member
Author
|
Kevin Donnelly (@kpdonn) |
Member
Author
|
Closed in favor of #23145. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes the issue of
keyofnow returningunique symbols that Kevin Donnelly (@kpdonn) reported in #20721, and Anders Hejlsberg (@ahejlsberg) were you looking at another issue this fixed?Regarding the implementation - I actually had to add a new relationship (ew) to handle comparing with constraints of generic index types. (To continue to allow, eg,
T[typeof sym]).