Skip to content

Missing documentation for argparse.ArgumentTypeError #64238

Description

@arnaut-billings
BPO 20039
Nosy @nchammas, @rahul-kumi, @ukarroum
PRs
  • bpo-20039: Add doc to argparse.ArgumentTypeError #31125
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2013-12-21.10:40:25.122>
    labels = ['type-feature', 'docs']
    title = 'Missing documentation for argparse.ArgumentTypeError'
    updated_at = <Date 2022-02-04.07:08:15.442>
    user = 'https://bugs.python.org/arnaut-billings'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2022-02-04.07:08:15.442>
    actor = 'ukarroum'
    assignee = 'docs@python'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Documentation']
    creation = <Date 2013-12-21.10:40:25.122>
    creator = 'arnaut-billings'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 20039
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 5.0
    messages = ['206723', '206768', '206783', '327986', '363839']
    nosy_count = 7.0
    nosy_names = ['bethard', 'docs@python', 'paul.j3', 'arnaut-billings', 'nchammas', 'rahul-kumi', 'ukarroum']
    pr_nums = ['31125']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = None
    stage = 'patch review'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue20039'
    versions = ['Python 3.3']

    Activity

    1. arnaut-billings commented on Dec 21, 2013

      arnaut-billingsmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      There is no documentation for argparse.ArgumentTypeError:

      http://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html

      Though it does appear in an example and its usage is simple enough to decipher what it means, it would none the less look more professional if there was formal documentation for it. Not only on what it is, but when it should actually be used, etc...

    2. paulj3 commented on Dec 21, 2013

      paulj3mannequin
      Mannequin

      In argparse.py the status of ArgumentTypeError is ambiguous.

      ArgumentError is listed as a public class, ArgumentTypeError is not. It also says 'All other classes in this module are considered implementation details.'

      ArgumentTypeError is a subclass of Exception (with no added functionality).

      ArgumentTypeError is raised only once, in the FileType class (which is both a scripting convenience and example of a custom type). As you note it is also used in the documentation example. There is also one such example in test_argparse.py.

      It is caught once, where it is converted into an ArgumentError. It is handled much like a ValueError or TypeError - except that its message is passed through unchanged.

      In http://bugs.python.org/issue13824 I use it several times in the FileContext class for just this reason.

      In fact ArgumentTypeError could be documented as a footnote to the type block, saying to the effect: 'An ArgumentTypeError may be raised (instead of a ValueError or TypeError) to produce a custom error message.'

      Normally an ArgumentTypeError is not passed back to the user code, consistent with the claim that it is not public.

      --------------

      Along the same line, should ArgumentError be documented better? Currently it is just mentioned at the end, as a replacement for an optparse error class.

      As best I can tell, the user code will only see an ArgumentError if the ArgumentParser.error method is customized. Otherwise that error is caught and converted into a system exit. Maybe the error paragraph in the documentation should get a sentence about ArgumentError.

      In test_argparse.py, ArgumentError is used extensively (with a custom error method).

    3. arnaut-billings commented on Dec 21, 2013

      arnaut-billingsmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      It seems what you're saying is that the ArgumentTypeError class should not be public, but being able to raise is should be public. If that's the case, I think it would be more clear to have an argparse.raiseArgumentTypeError method and document when it should be used.

      If such classes are meant to be private, why not prepend their names with an underscore and remove them from the __all__ list? (I thought a leading underscore meant that a module level variable was private to that module.)

    4. paulj3 commented on Oct 18, 2018

      paulj3mannequin
      Mannequin

      A related closed request: https://bugs.python.org/issue30220

      that wants to test ValueError for non-generic message, instead of using ArgumentTypeError.

    5. nchammas commented on Mar 10, 2020

      nchammasmannequin
      Mannequin

      Just a note that I also went looking for the docs for argparse.ArgumentTypeError after coming across it in this (highly viewed) post:

      https://stackoverflow.com/a/14117511/877069

    6. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    7. slateny commented on Nov 19, 2023

      @slateny
      Contributor

      Added to argparse by #103289

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      docsDocumentation in the Doc dirtype-featureA feature request or enhancement

      Projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions